Stream is a well-known restaurant technology API designed to integrate delivery platforms with POS systems. It facilitates order aggregation, menu synchronization, and real-time operational management, helping restaurants streamline their digital ordering processes.

However, Stream is not the only solution in the market. Depending on the size, business model, and integration needs of a restaurant, alternative platforms may offer features better suited to specific operations. In this article, we’ll analyze how Stream stacks up against competitors, breaking down key functionalities, pricing structures, and ideal use cases.

Competitor Comparison: Who Offers What?

Competitor Comparison: Who Offers What?

1. KitchenHub – Feature-Rich for Multi-Platform Operators

Key Advantages:

Branded Partner Dashboard – Unlike Stream, KitchenHub provides a customizable, white-labeled interface that allows businesses (such as restaurant groups, franchise operators, or POS resellers) to provide their partners or clients with a personalized experience under their own brand.
POS-Independent API – Works with multiple POS systems without requiring specific hardware adjustments.
Extensive Delivery Platform Integrations – Supports a broader range of third-party services than Stream.

Limitations:


❌ Pricing may be higher than simpler aggregation solutions.
❌ Requires technical expertise for custom implementations.

Best for: Multi-unit restaurants, ghost kitchens, and enterprises that require a branded integration experience.

2. Checkmate – Simplicity Over Complexity

Key Advantages:

Straightforward Integration – Ideal for restaurants looking for a basic connection between delivery platforms and POS systems.
Flat Pricing Model – Transparent and predictable pricing structure.

Limitations:

Lacks Multiple Pricing Support – Unlike Stream, Checkmate does not allow variable pricing across platforms.
Fewer Customization Options – Offers limited API flexibility for developers.

Best for: Small to mid-sized restaurants that need a cost-effective and simple solution.

3. Otter – Popular but Limited in Flexibility

Key Advantages:

User-Friendly Interface – Provides an intuitive dashboard for restaurant managers.
Basic Menu Syncing – Allows for streamlined updates, but lacks extensive customization options.

Limitations:

Limited API Access – Unlike Stream, Otter does not offer a fully open API, restricting integration possibilities.
Not Ideal for Large Chains – More suited for independent restaurants rather than enterprise-level operations.

Best for: Small restaurants or food trucks that need a plug-and-play solution without complex integrations.

4. Chowly – Focused on Automation

Key Advantages:

Automated Order Flow – Reduces human input errors by integrating directly with POS systems.
Flexible Pricing Plans – Various subscription tiers depending on restaurant size and needs.

Limitations:

Lacks a Branded Partner Dashboard – Unlike KitchenHub, Chowly does not offer white-label customization.
Limited Support for Non-Delivery Operations – Primarily focused on third-party delivery integration rather than in-house solutions.

Best for: Restaurants prioritizing automation but with minimal need for advanced customization.

5. Deliverect – A Strong Global Player

Key Advantages:

Broad Market Coverage – Works in multiple countries with extensive integrations.
Multi-Location Support – Ideal for restaurant chains managing multiple storefronts.

Limitations:

Pricing Can Be High for Small Operators – More cost-effective for larger enterprises.
Setup Complexity – Requires a more involved onboarding process than simpler alternatives.

Best for: International brands and multi-location restaurant groups.

6. Stream – A Balanced Option for Automation & Flexibility

Key Advantages:


Delivery Aggregation – Stream consolidates orders from multiple platforms directly into the POS system, reducing manual errors and streamlining operations.

Real-Time Menu Syncing – Automatically updates menus across integrated platforms to ensure consistency and minimize order discrepancies.

Flexible API Documentation – Offers clear, structured API documentation that makes it easier for developers to implement integrations compared to some competitors with complex or restrictive setups.

 Limitations:


No Branded Partner Dashboard – Unlike KitchenHub, Stream does not offer a fully white-labeled dashboard for partners or multi-brand operators. This means restaurants using Stream must work within the Stream-branded interface.
Requires Some Technical Setup – While not as complex as Deliverect, integrating Stream requires some API knowledge, making it less user-friendly than plug-and-play solutions like Otter.

Real-World Example:
A regional fast-casual burger chain with 10 locations adopted Stream to automate order processing across multiple third-party platforms. Before Stream, staff manually entered delivery orders into the POS, leading to frequent errors and delays. After implementing Stream, order processing became seamless, reducing mistakes and improving kitchen efficiency.

Best for:

Mid-sized restaurant chains that need multiple pricing support and delivery order automation.

Restaurants with existing POS systems that require a flexible integration without switching to a new tech stack.

Growing brands looking for automation but not yet at the enterprise level of needing Deliverect.

Which Solution Is Right for Your Restaurant?

Which Solution Is Right for Your Restaurant?

Choosing the best integration platform depends on your restaurant's size, business model, and operational needs. While all these solutions connect delivery marketplaces with POS systems, their strengths cater to different types of restaurants. Below is a guide to help you make an informed decision, along with real-world examples of how restaurants are using these platforms effectively.

For Small Restaurants & Food Trucks → Otter (simple, affordable, easy setup).

Best for: Independent restaurants, small cafés, food trucks, and mom-and-pop shops that primarily rely on third-party delivery platforms like Uber Eats, DoorDash, and Grubhub.
Why? Otter provides a plug-and-play solution with a simple dashboard for managing orders across multiple platforms without requiring deep technical knowledge or extensive setup.

Real-World Example:
A local taco truck in Austin, TX uses Otter to consolidate orders from Uber Eats and Grubhub. Before using Otter, the team manually entered orders into their POS, often leading to delays and errors. With Otter, all orders now appear in one interface, making operations smoother while keeping costs low.

For Mid-Sized Restaurants → Checkmate (cost-effective order aggregation).

Best for: Small restaurant chains, casual dining spots, and independent restaurants with multiple locations that want a cost-effective integration.
Why? Checkmate offers a straightforward and budget-friendly way to aggregate delivery orders into POS systems without extra frills or complexity.

Real-World Example:
A three-location pizzeria in Chicago switched to Checkmate after struggling with missed and misentered orders. By integrating orders directly into their POS, the restaurant eliminated manual entry errors, reduced order processing time, and improved customer satisfaction.

For Ghost Kitchens & Multi-Brand Operators → KitchenHub (branded dashboards, multi-platform support).

Best for: Virtual brands, ghost kitchens, and restaurants operating multiple brands under one roof.
Why? KitchenHub provides a Branded Partner Dashboard, enabling businesses to maintain brand identity while managing multiple delivery services from one platform. It also allows independent virtual brands to integrate with various POS systems seamlessly.

Real-World Example:
A ghost kitchen in Miami operates five different virtual restaurant brands from a single location. With KitchenHub, each brand’s orders are routed correctly to the kitchen, reducing confusion and improving efficiency. Additionally, KitchenHub’s Branded Partner Dashboard lets the operator offer a unified experience to restaurant partners under their own company branding.

Why a Branded Partner Dashboard Matters:

Large restaurant groups and POS resellers want to offer an integrated, white-labeled experience rather than directing users to a third-party system.

A fast-casual chain with 50+ locations using KitchenHub can provide its franchisees with a customized dashboard under its own brand, reinforcing brand loyalty while ensuring consistency across locations.

For Automation & Scaling → Chowly (hands-free order management).

Best for: Restaurants looking to minimize manual work and automate order management at scale.
Why? Chowly excels in fully automating the order flow between delivery platforms and POS systems, reducing the need for human intervention.

Real-World Example:
A national burger chain with 25 locations uses Chowly to automate order injection. Previously, staff had to manually input orders from Uber Eats, but now, orders flow directly into their POS, reducing errors and freeing up employees to focus on food prep and service.

For Large Chains & Enterprises → Deliverect (global reach, advanced multi-location management).

Best for: Enterprise-level restaurant chains and brands operating in multiple regions or internationally.
Why? Deliverect offers a scalable solution with robust multi-location management, advanced analytics, and deep customization options.

Real-World Example:
A global sushi chain with locations in the U.S., Canada, and Europe chose Deliverect to synchronize its menus and delivery operations across different markets. The platform helps them manage pricing variations by region and streamline reporting across all locations.

For Mid-Sized Restaurants & Growing Chains → Stream (automation with pricing flexibility).

Best for: Mid-sized restaurant chains, fast-casual brands, and multi-location restaurants that need automated order processing without enterprise-level complexity.

Why? Stream automates order injection and menu syncing while allowing restaurants to set different prices on each delivery platform. This helps reduce manual errors, streamline operations, and maintain profitability across third-party marketplaces.

Real-World Example: A 10-location burger chain in California switched to Stream after struggling with inconsistent pricing on Uber Eats and DoorDash. Before using Stream, employees had to manually adjust menu prices on each platform, leading to pricing errors and customer complaints. With Stream’s multiple pricing support, they now automatically apply different price structures based on the delivery service, helping them maintain profitability while keeping menu updates consistent across locations.

We hope it helped you have a better and deeper understanding of the ways different products work, and it will help expand your business, whether reselling POS systems or running a restaurant of your own.

We have more articles on analytics, insights, and tips. They are all right here.